Know what they're really saying —
before they do.
Profyls turns any text — an ad, an interview, a voicemail, a board update, a deposition — into a 189-signal psychometric read and the next move you should make. Pick a sample and watch it score live.
Meta Ads · variant B
Campaign: Q3 Launch · audience 'High-intent buyers'
Tired of feeling stuck? You deserve more. Our breakthrough system finally helps you unlock the life you've always wanted — risk-free, guaranteed, today only.
"Punchy, emotional, on-brand."
Trust markers absent. Tested against your audience's psycholinguistic profile: skews 41 IQ-points too 'pitchy' for your buyer.
Profyls verdict
scoring liveHigh-arousal · low-trust profile · 28% likely to underperform
Negative-affect open + scarcity stack + zero specificity. Reads as 'infomercial' to your ICP's analytic segment.
Tentative / Hedging
LIWC0
Self-Focus
LIWC0
Negations
LIWC0
Positive Emotion
SALLEE0
Negative Emotion
SALLEE0
The next move Profyls recommends
Swap 'breakthrough system' for one concrete proof point. Cut 'today only'. Re-test against control.
Powered by the scientific stack that 25,000+ peer-reviewed studies cite
The Profile
One person. 189 dimensions. One screen.
Every Profyls profile is a living document. As new text arrives — depositions, sessions, emails, transcripts — the profile updates. Track drift, spot inflection, anticipate moves.
- Big 5 radar with population-normed Z-scores
- Cognitive-load timeline across the conversation
- Hedging & negation heatmap by topic cluster
- Deception markers with cited supporting tokens
- Drives & values map (achievement, affiliation, power)
- Stress-fingerprint compared to baseline
Subject — Composite #4172
Last updated 14m ago · 23 documents
Big 5 Profile
Stress Fingerprint
Cognitive load over 16-min session
Top markers right now
14,287 profiles scored this week across 9 verticals · live counter.
Choose your mission
One platform. Nine tailored worlds.
Click the role you live in. The page re-themes to your context.
How will this judge, witness, or opposing counsel actually respond?
Walk into every room knowing the room.
Build psychometric profiles of judges, mediators, opposing counsel, witnesses, and jurors — from rulings, depositions, briefs, and public statements.
- Predict judicial rulings on procedural motions
- Stress-test witnesses pre-deposition
- Tailor voir dire to actual juror cognition
- Decode opposing counsel's negotiation style
Sample read
"Your Honor, with respect, the precedent the defense relies on is distinguishable. The court in Matsuda explicitly limited its holding to circumstances where the underlying contract was unenforceable."
Metrics that fire
Tentative
LIWCWitness hedging
Clout
Social DynamicsPower dynamics in transcripts
Analytic Thinking
CognitionJudicial reasoning style
Negations
LIWCDeception under cross
The two conversations
What you hear. What Profyls sees.
Same 23-second exchange. Same words. One side hears a witness. The other side sees a psychometric signature with three deception markers and a confidence collapse.
Transcript
Counsel
Can you walk me through what happened that night?
Profyls read
t = 0.0sCounsel
Can you walk me through what happened that night?
Profyls verdict
Confidence collapse between t=10 and t=19. Three deception-aligned markers cluster on consecutive answers. Recommend follow-up on the 9–11pm window.
87% predictive accuracy on judicial-ruling sentiment in 2025 internal benchmark.
"Caught a relapse spiral two weeks before she did." — Dr. M.K., LCSW (composite)
The observatory
180+ validated metrics.
One transparent system.
Every score traces to a published framework. No black boxes — admissible-ready, audit-friendly, and explainable to a judge, an HR partner, or a board.
How it works
Three steps. Thirty seconds.
Ingest
Drop in transcripts, emails, voicemails, depositions, ad copy, reviews — or pipe Zoom/Teams/Gong/Fathom directly.
Score
Profyls scores against 189 metrics across 8 frameworks. Every score traces to a published, peer-reviewed instrument.
Predict
Get the vertical-specific playbook: the next question to ask, the next risk to flag, the next move they'll make.
Voices from the field
One platform. Nine professions.
All quotes are illustrative composites — privacy is built in, not bolted on.
"I caught a client's relapse spiral two weeks before she did. The hedging score doubled and self-focus climbed — that's the whole conversation before the conversation."
— Dr. M.K., LCSW, Composite — private practice, Portland
"We stopped losing senior engineers to 9-month exits. The coachability score caught two 'perfect on paper' hires we would have made."
— Priya R., Composite — Head of Talent, mid-stage SaaS
"Three of the four incidents we investigated last year showed the same escalating language pattern 6+ weeks earlier. Now we catch it."
— James T., Composite — VP Risk, financial services
"Caught a power-symmetry mismatch with a co-founder candidate before we signed paper. Saved us 18 months and a cap-table mess."
— Alex W., Composite — 3x founder, YC alum
"We predicted the judge would grant our motion to compel — and she did, citing language we'd flagged from three prior rulings."
— Sarah L., Esq., Composite — litigation partner, AmLaw 200
"I stopped getting fooled by polished plans. The hedging score tells me when a client is stalling — usually before they know they are."
— Marcus B., PCC, Composite — executive coach
"We knew they'd take 18% before they offered 12. The concession-language curve was unmistakable."
— Dana V., Composite — M&A negotiator
"We found a 14% cluster nobody on the team had noticed. New creative against them outperformed our control by 3.2x."
— Lena O., Composite — CMO, DTC brand
"Hedging language in two portcos' Q3 updates predicted the down-round conversations we had in Q4. We were prepared."
— Ravi N., Composite — Partner, Series A fund
Honest comparison
Generic LLMs are great writers.
Profyls is a psychometric instrument.
| Capability | Profyls.ai | Mind Reasoner | MindSim | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peer-reviewed scientific foundation (LIWC, 25,000+ studies) | ||||
| 189+ explainable metrics across 8 frameworks | ||||
| Pre-built vertical workflows (9 verticals) | ||||
| Persona switching across 9 high-stakes roles | ||||
| Compliance-aware scoring (HIPAA, EEOC, ABA 1.6) | ||||
| Transparent, theory-driven (not black-box ML) | ||||
| Transcript ingestion (Zoom/Teams/Gong/Fathom) | ||||
| Per-profile longitudinal tracking | ||||
| Decision-prediction layer per vertical | ||||
| API for engineering teams |
Comparison reflects publicly available product positioning as of 2026. Trademarks belong to their owners.
Decision simulator
Pick the moment. Get the playbook.
We score a sample profile. You get the three questions most likely to move the conversation, plus the predicted response pattern.
Sample profile
3 questions most likely to move them
- 1
When you said you 'don't recall,' walk me through what you do recall about that hour.
- 2
Earlier you used the word 'probably' three times — what specifically makes it less than certain?
- 3
If we were to pull your phone location data for that window, what would it show?
Predicted response
Long pause. Voluntary clarification on the 9–11pm window. Hedging will collapse on Q3.
Theory-driven, not a black box. Admissible-ready.
Every Profyls score traces to a published, peer-reviewed framework — LIWC, Big 5, DISC, SALLEE, Drives, Cognition, Temporal, Toxicity. We never store data we don't need. We never train models on your data. We never share across customers.
The room is waiting
You read the deck.
Now read the person.
We onboard new firms, clinics, funds and teams every Monday.